From Snow White to Moana: Disney Has Been Remaking Its Own Movies for a Decade — Here's the Full Timeline

3 hours ago by Casey Throwback Mills 6 min read

In 2015, Disney released a live-action Cinderella and quietly launched the most ambitious remake experiment in film history. Ten years and a dozen films later, we're still watching them do it — and the results are more complicated than you think.

Ten years ago, Kenneth Branagh directed a live-action Cinderella and it made $543 million worldwide. Disney looked at that number, looked at its vault of animated classics, and thought: what if we just... did all of them again?

That decision launched the most ambitious — and most debated — remake project in Hollywood history. This week, Moana becomes the latest animated classic to get the live-action treatment. Before you buy your ticket, let's walk through how we got here.

The Experiment Begins (2010–2015)

Disney had been dabbling before Cinderella. Tim Burton's Alice in Wonderland (2010) made over $1 billion and proved the concept, but it was more "reimagining" than remake. Maleficent (2014) took the villain's perspective on Sleeping Beauty — again, more spin-off than straight adaptation.

Then came Cinderella. Branagh played it straight — a faithful, gorgeous retelling with Cate Blanchett as Lady Tremaine and Lily James in the glass slippers. It was beautiful. It was respectful. It made half a billion dollars. And it told Disney everything they needed to know.

The Golden Age (2016–2019)

This is when Disney went all-in. Four films in four years, each bigger than the last.

The Jungle Book (2016) — Jon Favreau turned the 1967 animated classic into a technical marvel. One real kid, everything else CGI. It made $966 million and won the VFX Oscar. This was the proof of concept that made everything else possible.

Beauty and the Beast (2017) — Emma Watson as Belle, Dan Stevens as the Beast. The 1991 original was the first animated film nominated for Best Picture. The remake made $1.264 billion. That's not a typo. A billion-two from a movie everyone had already seen. Disney's accountants started working overtime.

Aladdin (2019) — Will Smith replacing Robin Williams as the Genie was a gamble that somehow worked. Guy Ritchie directed. Nobody expected it to make $1.054 billion. Everyone was wrong.

The Lion King (2019) — Favreau again, this time with photorealistic animals and an all-star voice cast. It grossed $1.663 billion worldwide. It was also the first remake where critics seriously pushed back — "technically impressive, emotionally flat" became the consensus. But the money spoke for itself.

Four films. Over $4.9 billion combined. Disney had found a money printer.

The Complications (2019–2023)

Then things got interesting.

Dumbo (2019) — Tim Burton's take on the 1941 classic was the first outright disappointment. $353 million worldwide on a $170 million budget. Not a disaster, but not the billion-dollar machine Disney expected.

Mulan (2020) — COVID killed its theatrical run. Disney pivoted to a $30 premium on Disney+, which angered fans and theaters alike. The film itself removed the songs, removed Mushu, and added a Phoenix. The 1998 original fans were not amused. $70 million theatrically.

Cruella (2021) — The surprise hit. Emma Stone as a young Cruella de Vil, styled as a punk fashion origin story. Critics loved it. Audiences loved it. $233 million on a simultaneous Disney+ release. Proof that the remake formula works best when it actually reimagines something.

Pinocchio (2022) — Went straight to Disney+. Tom Hanks as Geppetto. It was... fine. No theatrical release, no cultural impact, no conversation.

Peter Pan & Wendy (2023) — Also straight to Disney+. Jude Law as Captain Hook. Also fine. Also forgotten within a week.

The Little Mermaid (2023) — Back to theaters with Halle Bailey as Ariel. It made $569 million — respectable, but a significant step down from the billion-dollar era. The 1989 original grossed $233 million (adjusted: ~$500 million). The remake barely outpaced inflation.

The New Wave (2024–2026)

Mufasa: The Lion King (2024) — Not a remake but a prequel, telling Mufasa's origin story. Barry Jenkins directed. $700 million worldwide — a solid hit that proved the Lion King brand still draws crowds.

Snow White (2025) — Rachel Zegler as Snow White. Gal Gadot as the Evil Queen. This one generated controversy before it even opened, from casting debates to marketing missteps. It became the most talked-about Disney remake since Lion King — for very different reasons.

Moana (2026) — And here we are. Thomas Kail (Hamilton) directs. Catherine Laga'aia steps into the role. Dwayne Johnson returns as Maui. The original Moana grossed $687 million in 2016. Can the live-action version match it?

What Have We Learned?

Ten years. Over a dozen films. Billions of dollars. Here's what the experiment has actually shown us:

The formula works when: The source material is universally beloved AND the remake offers something genuinely new (Jungle Book's technology, Beauty and the Beast's spectacle, Cruella's reinvention).

The formula fails when: The remake is a shot-for-shot recreation that replaces hand-drawn warmth with photorealistic coldness (Lion King), or when the changes alienate the original's fanbase (Mulan), or when Disney doesn't even believe in it enough for theaters (Pinocchio, Peter Pan).

The trend line: The billion-dollar era (2017-2019) is likely over. Audiences have gotten smarter about what deserves a theater trip. The Little Mermaid's $569 million was fine, but it wasn't Aladdin money. Moana needs to answer the question: is there still enough nostalgia left to sell?

I watched these originals as a kid. Most of you probably did too. There's something both beautiful and strange about watching a studio systematically revisit every piece of your childhood, one film at a time. Sometimes they capture lightning in a bottle again. Sometimes they remind you why the original was special in the first place — by failing to match it.

Moana opens this week. The experiment continues. And somewhere in the Disney vault, there's an executive looking at a poster for Hercules and thinking: that one's next.


Comments (0)